952 P.2d 59
SC S44330Oregon Supreme Court.Argued and submitted March 3, 1998
Decisions of the Department of Corrections, The Corrections Facility Siting Authority, And the Governor affirmed March 19, 1998
On judicial review of the decisions of the Department of Corrections, the Corrections Facility Siting Authority, and the Governor.
John R. Huttl, of Frohnmayer, Deatherage, Pratt, Jamieson
Clarke, Medford, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.
Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
En Banc
PER CURIAM
The decisions of the Department of Corrections, the Corrections Facility Siting Authority, and the Governor are affirmed.
Page 525
[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 526
PER CURIAM
This is a case of direct review of decisions by the Corrections Facility Siting Authority and the Governor to approve, and by the Department of Corrections to site, a prison at Stimpson Gulch in Jackson County.[1] Petitioners own property in the vicinity of the proposed site. They challenge the siting decisions, raising several statutory and constitutional issues. We have considered all of petitioners’ challenges, but conclude that they either are controlled by this court’s decision in City of Wilsonville v. Dept. of Corrections, 326 Or. 152, 951 P.2d 128
(1997), or otherwise are not well taken.
The decisions of the Department of Corrections, the Corrections Facility Siting Authority, and the Governor are affirmed.
Page 527
501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…
044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…
April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…
March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…
361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…
234 March 9, 2017 No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…