WASHINGTON COUNTY v. LAND CONSERV. AND DEV’T COMM., 326 Or. 66 (1997)

947 P.2d 206

WASHINGTON COUNTY, Respondent on Review, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Petitioner on Review, and McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION, Intervenor. Bruce BERGEY, Respondent on Review, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Petitioner on Review, and McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION, Intervenor.

CA A91703 (Control), CA A91734; SC S44557Oregon Supreme Court.On petition for review filed September 24, 1997 Petition for review allowed; Decision of the Court of Appeals vacated;
Case remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration October 23, 1997

On review from the Court of Appeals.[*]

[*] Judicial review from Land Conservation and Development Commission. 149 Or. App. 281, 942 P.2d 836 (1997).

Stephanie L. Striffler, Special Counsel to the Attorney General, Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

No appearance contra.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.[**]

Page 67

[**] Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Lane County v. LCDC, 325 Or. 569, 942 P.2d 278 (1997).

Page 68

jdjungle