STATE v. ROHRS, 333 Or. 397 (2002)

40 P.3d 505

STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. ROBERT JAMES ROHRS, SR., Respondent on Review.

(CC TC96-15055; CA A97743; S.C. S46152)Oregon Supreme Court.Argued and submitted January 6, 2000.
Filed: February 14, 2002

On review from the Court of Appeals.[*]

[*] Appeal from Clackamas County District Court, Deanne L. Darling, Judge. 157 Or. App. 494, 970 P.2d 262 (1998).

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

John Henry Hingson III, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, and LEESON, Justices.[**]

[**] Van Hoomissen, J., retired December 31, 2000, and did not participate in the decision of this case; Kulongoski, J., resigned June 14, 2001, and did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case; Riggs, De Muniz, and Balmer, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court.

Page 398

jdjungle