Categories: Oregon Supreme Court

STATE v. NESBIT, 343 Or. 222 (2007)

168 P.3d 1153

State v. Kevin Lee Nesbit.

Nos. (A125949)(S54894).Oregon Supreme Court.
October 4, 2007.

Appeal from the 212 Or App 496.

Petitions for Review Allowed.

Appellant’s petition for review is allowed. The parties’joint motion to vacate defendant’s conviction and remand the case to the trial court for entry of a judgment of dismissal of defendant’s conviction is granted. The decision of the Court of appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Multnomah County Circuit Court with instructions to vacate defendant’s conviction and to enter a judgment of dismissal.

In eac h of the following cases, upo n consideration bythe court:

Respondent’s petition for revie w is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and case is remande d to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 159 P3d 1151 (2007).

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago