STATE v. MILLER, 109 Or. App. 489 (1992)

818 P.2d 1302

88-02-32411, 88-02-32412, 88-03-32639; CA A66775 (Control), A66776, A66777Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted September 6, 1991.
Affirmed in part and vacated in part October 30, 1991. Reconsideration denied January 15, 1992. Petition for review denied February 25, 1992 (312 Or. 677)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Joseph F. Ceniceros, Judge.

E. Ted Meece, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Deich and Meece, Portland.

Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Judgment of conviction for conspiracy to commit first degree theft affirmed; judgment of conviction for attempted first degree theft vacated.

Page 490

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from his convictions for three counts of criminal conspiracy to commit first degree theft, ORS 161.450; ORS 164.055, for which he received sentences of five years’ imprisonment with a six-month minimum on each count, to be served consecutively. He was also convicted of three counts of attempted first degree theft, ORS 161.405; ORS 164.055, and was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently with the conspiracy sentences. We affirm the conspiracy convictions but vacate the attempt convictions.

Defendant’s challenges to his conspiracy convictions require no discussion. We accept the state’s concession that defendant was improperly convicted of both attempt and conspiracy for the same conduct. ORS 161.485(2).[1]

Judgment of conviction for conspiracy to commit first degree theft affirmed; judgment of conviction for attempted first degree theft vacated.

Page 491