STATE v. McCOY, 4 Or. App. 378 (1971)

479 P.2d 247

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOCELYN McCOY, Appellant.

Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued January 20, 1971
Affirmed January 20, 1971 Petition for review denied March 30, 1971

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lane County, EDWIN E. ALLEN, Judge.

Richard C. Owens, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Babcock Ackerman and Robert L. Ackerman, Springfield.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and FOLEY and THORNTON, Judges.

AFFIRMED.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

This appeal presented no unusual or difficult questions. Having previously studied the briefs, immediately upon conclusion of argument, and after briefly stating to counsel our reasons, we ruled from the bench. Setting forth those reasons in a detailed opinion would add nothing of value to the existing body of judicial precedent. Our ruling was:

Affirmed.

Page 379

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 479 P.2d 247

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago