880 P.2d 431
DC 903896; CA A70304; SC S39919Oregon Supreme Court.Argued and submitted August 31, 1993
September 9, 1994
Jeffrey C. Hollen, of Richardson, Ouderkirk Hollen, Newport, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.
Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Peterson,[**] Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, and Graber, Justices.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed by an equally divided court.
Unis, J., dissented and filed an opinion.
Page 108
UNIS, J., dissenting.
In my view, the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case should be vacated, and this case should be remanded to the Court of Appeals in light of this court’s decision in State v. Nagel, 320 Or. 24, 880 P.2d 451 (1994).
Page 109
501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…
044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…
April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…
March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…
361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…
234 March 9, 2017 No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…