Categories: Oregon Court of Appeals Opinions

SOTO v. SAIF CORPORATION, 123 Or. App. 358 (1993)

860 P.2d 824

In the Matter of the Compensation of Olga I. Soto, Claimant. Olga I. SOTO, Petitioner — Cross-Respondent, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Little Learning Center, Respondents — Cross-Petitioners.

WCB 91-12369; CA A74702Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted May 21, reversed and remanded for reconsideration on petition and on cross-petition September 22, 1993

Judicial Review from Workers’ Compensation Board.

Edward J. Harri, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Stanley Fields, Salem.

John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents — cross-petitioners. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration on petition and on cross-petition. Pacheco-Gonzalez v. SAIF, 123 Or. App. 312, 860 P.2d 822 (1993).

Page 359

jdjungle