PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 320 Or. 493 (1994)

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (887 P.2d 792, 793)Oregon Supreme Court.
1994.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

DENIED December 20, 1994 (887 P.2d 793, 794)
State v. Potter, Gary Ely (A79335) (S41785) (130 Or. App. 679)

State v. Shelters, William Edward (A82295) (S41814) (131 Or. App. 269)

State v. Smith, Mark Lynn (A83198) (S41817) (131 Or. App. 269) December 27, 1994
Association of Oregon Loggers, Inc. v. Department of Insurance and Finance (A78305) (S41800) (130 Or. App. 594)

Barrett Business Services v. VanWormer (A83591) (S41837) (131 Or. App. 267)

Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority v. City of Medford

(A84711) (S41703) (130 Or. App. 24)

Loewen v. Galligan (A77913) (S41717) (130 Or. App. 222). Unis and Durham, JJ., would allow.

Martin v. Oregon State University (A80615) (S41777) (127 Or. App. 137)

Multnomah County v. One 1990 Red Harley Davidson Motorcycle, OLP #M428444 and Stanwood (A82255) (S41734) (129 Or. App. 305)

Ortiz-Patricio, Presidi v. Baldwin (A83407) (S41818) (130 Or. App. 679)

Rochat v. Rochat (A82273) (S41833) (131 Or. App. 261)

State v. Cardwell, Cecil Irwin (A80259) (S41786) (130 Or. App. 678)

State v. Giffen, Jack Samuel, Jr. (A80939) (S41826) (131 Or. App. 269)

State v. Gillespie, John (A79496) (S41744) (130 Or. App. 678). Unis and Durham, JJ., would allow.

State v. Gorham, A. Kent (A80952) (S41789) (131 Or. App. 267)

State v. Schwindt, Douglas Michael (A81155) (S41812) (131 Or. App. 269)

Topolic v. Rolie (A81679) (S41821) (131 Or. App. 72)

Ventura, James L. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A81800) (S41828) (131 Or. App. 269)

(888 P.2d 569) DISMISSED December 29, 1994
Fitzpatrick v. Beaverton Welding (A74892) (S41322) (127 Or. App. 560) The parties have entered into a settlement of this matter and have moved for a remand to the Workers’ Compensation Board for approval of the settlement. The motion is allowed. Petition for review, previously allowed July 5, 1994 (319 Or. 281), and judicial review are dismissed with leave to seek reinstatement if the Board should fail to approve the settlement. Settlement remanded to Workers’ Compensation Board; judicial review dismissed.

Page 494

jdjungle