Categories: Oregon Court of Appeals Opinions

PANEK v. OREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIV. AND SAIF, 123 Or. App. 636 (1994)

861 P.2d 363

In the Matter of the Compensation of Pamela J. Panek, Claimant. Pamela J. PANEK, Petitioner, v. OREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

WCB 91-01729; CA A75325Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted March 29, reversed and remanded for reconsideration in part; otherwise affirmed October 6, reconsideration denied December 15, 1993, petition for review pending 1994

Judicial Review from Workers’ Compensation Board.

Kevin Keaney, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary Conboy, Portland.

Steve Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration of compensability of proposed medical treatment; otherwise affirmed Jefferson v. Sam’s Cafe, 123 Or. App. 464, 861 P.2d 359 (1993).

Page 637

jdjungle