OREGON BUSINESS PLANNING COUNCIL v. LCDC, 49 Or. App. 151 (1980)

619 P.2d 1300

OREGON BUSINESS PLANNING COUNCIL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT, Respondent.

CA 17502Oregon Court of Appeals.
On respondent’s motion to dismiss petition for review filed May 29, motion to dismiss denied November 17, 1980

David G. Frost, Hillsboro, appeared for petitioner.

James M. Brown, Attorney General, Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, and Mary J. Deits, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, appeared for respondent.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Buttler, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss denied.

PER CURIAM

The motion to dismiss is denied to the extent it contends that the order appealed from is a rule. Oregon Business Planning Council v. LCDC, 49 Or. App. 153, 619 P.2d 1291 (1980). The motion to dismiss is denied with leave to renew in brief and argument to the extent it contends that this appeal is not from a final order.

Page 152

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago