772 P.2d 451

In the Matter of the Marriage of O’DAY, Respondent — Cross-Appellant, and O’DAY, Appellant — Cross-Respondent.

CV 87-0752; CA A49659Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted March 24, 1989
On appeal, modified; affirmed as modified; affirmed on cross-appeal April 26, 1989

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Benton County, Jackson L. Frost, Judge.

Robert G. Ringo, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. On the brief were Patrick L. Hadlock and Ringo Stuber, P.C., Corvallis.

Ronald L. Marek, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent — cross-appellant.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

On appeal, modified to award wife spousal support of $200 per month for 1991, 1992 and 1993, ending in December, 1993; affirmed as modified; affirmed on cross-appeal. Costs to wife on appeal and cross-appeal.

Page 289

PER CURIAM

Wife appeals a dissolution judgment and challenges the trial court’s spousal support award of “$400 per month from April to December, 1988; $300 per month beginning December, 1988, and each year successively $200 and $100 per month ending December, 1991.” On de novo review, we conclude that spousal support for 1991 should be $200 per month, and that it should continue at that level, ending in December, 1993.

Husband cross-appeals the property division, and we affirm on the cross-appeal.

On appeal, judgment modified to award wife spousal support of $200 per month for 1991, 1992 and 1993, ending in December, 1993; affirmed as modified; affirmed on cross-appeal. Costs to wife on appeal and cross-appeal.

Page 290

Tagged: