Categories: Oregon Supreme Court

NELSON v. KULONGOSKI, 322 Or. 328 (1995)

905 P.2d 1152

Polly L. NELSON and Emilio Hernandez, Jr., Petitioners, v. Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.

SC S42642Oregon Supreme Court.Argued and submitted November 4, 1995
Ballot title certified November 24, 1995

In Banc

On petition to review ballot title.

Lynn R. Nakamoto, of ACLU Foundation of Oregon, Inc., Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the petition was Robert D. Bulkley, Jr.

John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the answering memorandum were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

PER CURIAM

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(9).

Page 329

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

Page 330

PER CURIAM

This is an original proceeding for review of a ballot title for an initiative measure that proposes to add a new section to the Oregon Constitution. Petitioners are electors who filed comments with the Secretary of State pursuant to ORS 250.067 (1) and who, therefore, are entitled to bring this proceeding under ORS 250.085.

The Attorney General certified this ballot title for the proposed initiative measure:

“AMENDS CONSTITUTION: PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS MUST REPORT ILLEGAL ALIEN INFORMATION TO IMMIGRATION AUTHORITIES
“RESULT OF `YES’ VOTE: `Yes’ vote requires public institutions to report illegal alien information to federal immigration authorities.
“RESULT OF `NO’ VOTE: `No’ vote rejects requiring public institutions to report illegal alien information to federal immigration authorities.
“SUMMARY: Amends Oregon Constitution. Requires state, local governments and publicly-funded institutions having probative information that a person is an illegal alien to report information to federal immigration authorities. Requires such entities having probative information that an arrested person is an illegal alien to report information to federal immigration authorities. Forbids state, local governments, publicly-funded institutions from adopting or enforcing law or policy prohibiting or hindering cooperation between such entities and federal immigration authorities. Allows governments and United States citizens to sue to enforce measure.”

We have considered all of petitioners’ arguments as to why that ballot title does not comply substantially with the requirements of ORS 250.035 (2). We are not persuaded by any of those arguments. Accordingly, we decline to modify the Attorney General’s ballot title.

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(9).

Page 331

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago