McGOWAN v. CITY OF EUGENE, 102 Or. App. 512 (1990)

795 P.2d 563

Robert McGOWAN and Coeta McGowan, Petitioners, v. CITY OF EUGENE, and Cuddeback Investments, Respondents.

89-078; CA A62779Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted January 8, 1990
Affirmed July 18, 1990.

Judicial Review from Land Use Board of Appeals.

Michael E. Farthing, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Linda Y. Lee, Eugene.

Timothy J. Sercombe, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent City of Eugene. With him on the brief was Harrang, Long, Watkinson, Arnold Laird, P.C., Eugene.

William Kloos, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent Cuddeback Investments. With him on the brief was Johnson
Kloos, Eugene.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

Page 513

PER CURIAM

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s affirmance of the City of Eugene’s rezoning of a 29-acre area. The city allowed the zone change after the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission ordered the annexation of the area to the city. Petitioners also sought our review of the boundary commission’s annexation order. In McGowan v. Lane County Local Govt. Bdry. Comm., 102 Or. App. 381, 795 P.2d 560 (1990), we affirmed the annexation order.

Petitioners’ arguments for reversing LUBA’s decision are without merit and do not require discussion.

Affirmed.

Page 514