Categories: Oregon Supreme Court

McEWEN v. CUTLER, 124 Or. 584 (1928)

265 P. 1116

HAROLD McEWEN v. A.B. CUTLER.

Oregon Supreme Court.Argued March 5, 1928
Affirmed March 20, 1928

From Multnomah: GEORGE ROSSMAN, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Senn Recken and Mr. F.C. McDougal, with an oral argument by Mr. F.S. Senn.

For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Chester G. Murphy.

PER CURIAM.

The court is unanimously of the opinion that there is manifestly no merit in this appeal. Therefore, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. AFFIRMED.

Page 585

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 265 P. 1116

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago