637 P.2d 233
No. D15-529, CA 18799Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued April 17, 1981.
December 14, 1981.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County, Albert R. Musick, Judge.
Richard Wm. Davis, Portland, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Lindsay, Hart, Neil Weigler, Portland.
R. G. Stephenson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With him on the brief were I. Franklin Hunsaker and Bullivant, Wright, Leedy, Johnson, Pendergrass Hoffman, Portland.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
Page 200
PER CURIAM.
Wife appeals from those portions of a dissolution decree concerning the division of property, the amount of child support and attorney fees. Husband cross-appeals. We affirm the trial court in all respects, save its determination of the amount of child support.
We must consider the adequacy of child support in light of the formula and factors recently set out by the Supreme Court in Smith v. Smith, 290 Or. 675, 626 P.2d 342 (1981). Smith
requires courts initially to use a formula which relates the income of both parties to the children’s needs. Although evidence of some of these factors exists in the record, the record is inadequate to enable us to make a determination of the children’s needs following the guidelines set out in Smith.
Therefore, we remand for a redetermination of child support consistent with Smith.
Affirmed in part and remanded for redetermination of child support. No costs to either party.
Page 201
501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…
044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…
April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…
March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…
361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…
234 March 9, 2017 No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…