Categories: Oregon Court of Appeals Opinions

KING v. BUILDING SUPPLY DISCOUNT, 138 Or. App. 519 (1996)

909 P.2d 901

In the Matter of the Compensation of James M. King, Claimant. James M. KING, Petitioner, v. BUILDING SUPPLY DISCOUNT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

WCB 93-06873; CA A84940Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted December 8, 1995.
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 17, 1996.

Judicial Review from Workers’ Compensation Board.

Michael A. Gilbertson argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Steve Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. King v. Building Supply Discount, 133 Or. App. 179, 889 P.2d 1310
(1995).

Page 520

jdjungle