JOHNSON v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF PORTLAND, 162 Or. App. 527 (1999)

986 P.2d 666

DARYL JOHNSON, Appellant, v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF PORTLAND, PORTLAND PARKS AND RECREATION BUREAU, and CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondents.

No. (9610008072; CA A98841).Oregon Court of Appeals.On appellant’s motion for clarification of disposition filed August 4,
and respondent’s response filed August 10; motion granted; dispostion
(161 Or. App. 489, 985 P.2d 854) modified; otherwise adhered to September 15, 1999

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, William J. Keys, Judge.

Susan D. Marmaduke and James, Denecke, Urrutia Marmaduke, P.C., for motion.

Liana Colombo, Deputy City Attorney, and Marianna Kanwit, contra.

Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Linder, Judges.

HASELTON, J.

Motion granted; disposition modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner’s entitlement to ancillary relief, including reinstatement and restitution, pursuant to ORS 34.100.”; otherwise adhered to.

Page 528

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

Page 529

HASELTON, J.

Appellant has moved to “clarify” our disposition because “[i]t seems the parties are unable to agree on what the Court of Appeals intended to happen next.” We allow the motion. Our disposition “Reversed and remanded,” Johnson v. Civil Service Board, 161 Or. App. 489, 506, 985 P.2d 854 (1999), is clarified and modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner’s entitlement to ancillary relief, including reinstatement and restitution, pursuant to ORS 34.100.”

Motion granted; disposition modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner’s entitlement to ancillary relief, including reinstatement and restitution, pursuant to ORS 34.100.”; otherwise adhered to.

Page 530

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 986 P.2d 666

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago