Categories: Oregon Supreme Court

JACKSON v. HAMMAN STAGE LINES, INC., 269 Or. 261 (1974)

524 P.2d 60

JACKSON, Appellant, v. HAMMAN STAGE LINES, INC., Respondent.

Oregon Supreme Court.Argued April 2, 1974
Affirmed August 1, 1974

IN BANC

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

JOHN A. JELDERKS, JR., Judge.

Bruce W. Williams, Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Page 262

David P. Templeton, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dusenbery, Martin, Bischoff Templeton, Portland.

AFFIRMED.

DENECKE, J.

Plaintiff was a passenger in a car which collided with defendant’s bus. In plaintiff’s ensuing personal injury action the jury found for the defendant and plaintiff appeals.

The collision occurred in an intersection which was controlled by a traffic control signal. The vehicles approached the intersection from opposite directions. Plaintiff’s car attempted a left turn and was struck by the bus.

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the duties imposed by ORS 483.202 (1), (2) and the provisions of (3).[1] These statutes by their terms are inapplicable to this collision.

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s refusal

Page 263

to instruct, as requested, that plaintiff could recover for mental anguish caused by the collision. The evidence was undisputed that the plaintiff received some physical injury because of the collision; therefore, the verdict for the defendant must have been predicated upon a finding that the defendant was not negligent. For this reason the trial court’s failure to instruct could not be prejudicial.

Affirmed.

[1] ORS 483.202 (1), (2), (3):

“(1) The driver of a vehicle entering a freeway or other arterial highway where an acceleration or merging lane is provided for his use shall look out for and give right of way to vehicles on the freeway or other arterial highway.
“(2) Drivers, when approaching other uncontrolled highway intersections, shall look out for and give right of way to vehicles on the right, simultaneously approaching a given point, whether such vehicle first enters and reaches the intersection or not.
“(3) Subsections (1) and (2) of this section do not apply at any intersection where and when traffic is controlled by traffic control signals, signs or police officers. Any driver entering an intersection at an unlawful speed shall forfeit any right of way he would otherwise have under subsection (1) or (2) of this section.”

Page 264

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 524 P.2d 60

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago