HALLMARK FISHERIES v. HARVEY, 100 Or. App. 657 (1990)

788 P.2d 471

In the Matter of the Compensation of Michael J. Harvey, Claimant. HALLMARK FISHERIES et al, Petitioners, v. HARVEY, Respondent.

87-06987; CA A61323Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted January 12, 1990
Affirmed March 7, 1990

Judicial Review from Workers’ Compensation Board.

Paul L. Roess, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Acker, Underwood, Norwood Hiefield, Portland.

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Malagon, Moore Johnson, Eugene.

Before Graber, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

Page 658

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Worker’s Compensation Board awarding claimant temporary total disability (TTD) benefits. Claimant injured his back while working for employer. He filed a claim and received TTD. He returned to work before his claim was closed, but was fired for smoking marijuana on the work site two days later. On March 5, 1987, while still unemployed, claimant was declared by his treating physician to be physically unable to work, due to his work-related injury.

Employer argues that the Board’s order is inadequate for judicial review, because there was no finding of a “worsening” which, according to employer, is required to trigger reinstatement of TTD. Proof of a subsequent “worsening” is required only after a claim has been initially closed. ORS 656.273; Rodgers v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 88 Or. App. 458, 460, 745 P.2d 820 (1987). Claimant was working for employer when he suffered the disabling injury. As of March 5, he was entitled to TTD until he became medically stationary and was released for work. See Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Kepford, 100 Or. App. 410, 786 P.2d 745 (1990).

Affirmed.[1]

[1] Employer also argues that there is not substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings. We disagree.

Page 659

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 788 P.2d 471

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

9 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago