Categories: Oregon Court of Appeals Opinions

EPSON PORTLAND, INC. v. VEOPRADITH, 122 Or. App. 293 (1993)

855 P.2d 1170

In the Matter of the Compensation of Phon Veopradith, Claimant. EPSON PORTLAND, INC., Petitioner, v. Phon VEOPRADITH, Respondent.

WCB 91-05537; CA A77431Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted July 2, reversed and remanded for reconsideration August 4, reconsideration denied October 27, petition for review denied December 14, 1993 (318 Or. 171)

Judicial Review from Workers’ Compensation Board.

Jean Back, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Brian B. Doherty, William H. Walters and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager Carlsen, Portland.

Kevin N. Keaney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary
Conboy, Portland.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Tektronix, Inc. v. Nazari, 117 Or. App. 409, 844 P.2d 258 (1992), on recon 120 Or. App. 590, 853 P.2d 315 (1993).

Page 294

jdjungle