ELLIS v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, 31 Or. App. 385 (1974)

570 P.2d 427

ELLIS, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al, Respondents.

No. 76-AB-1380, 76-AB-1380A and 77-5-876EB, CA 7963 (control) and 8364Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued September 28, affirmed October 24, 1974

Judicial Review from Employment Appeals Board.

Magar E. Magar, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

W. Benny Won, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Division. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Al J. Laue, Solicitor General, Salem.

No appearance for respondent Manpower Inc.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Johnson, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Page 386

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

Page 387

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from two orders of the Employment Appeals Board, both of which affirmed referees’ decisions which in turn affirmed administrators’ decisions denying claimant unemployment compensation. Each order covers a different period. As to the first period, claimant was declared ineligible because there was suitable work available which without good reason he chose not to accept. As to the second period, claimant was denied benefits because he refused to accept work paying less than an hourly rate which he was not warranted in demanding and thus was not available for suitable employment. There was ample evidence to support the findings of the Employment Appeals Board in both instances.

Affirmed.

Page 388

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

Page 389