Categories: Oregon Supreme Court

EARLS v. KULONGOSKI, 322 Or. 377 (1995)

907 P.2d 1113

Kevin C. EARLS, Petitioner, v. Theodore KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.

SC S42751Oregon Supreme Court.Argued and submitted December 5, 1995
Ballot title certified December 21, 1995

In Banc

On petition to review ballot title.

James E. Mountain, Jr., Salem, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, waived appearance for respondent.

PER CURIAM

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(9).

Page 378

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

Page 379

PER CURIAM

This is an original proceeding in which petitioner challenges the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioner is an elector who, in a timely manner, submitted written comments about the Attorney General’s draft ballot title, pursuant to ORS 250.067 (1). Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to seek a different title in this court, ORS 250.085
(2). We have considered each of petitioner’s arguments concerning the Attorney General’s ballot title. We conclude that none demonstrates a failure on the part of the Attorney General to comply substantially with the requirements of ORS 250.035. See ORS 250.085 (5) (establishing that formula as this court’s standard of review). We therefore certify the following ballot title:

AMENDS CONSTITUTION: GOVERNMENT, PRIVATE ENTITIES CANNOT DISCRIMINATE AMONG HEALTH CARE PROVIDER CATEGORIES
RESULT OF “YES” VOTE: “Yes” vote forbids government and private entities from discriminating among categories of health care providers.
RESULT OF “NO” VOTE: “No” vote leaves Constitution silent on private and government discrimination among health care provider categories.
SUMMARY: Amends Oregon Constitution. Forbids laws that restrain any person’s choice to receive health care from any category of health care provider working within provider’s scope of practice established by law. Forbids state agencies, local governments, private entities from discriminating among categories of health care providers rendering the same or similar services within their scope of practice. Defines “health care provider.” Allows entities to control health care costs if entities do not violate measure. Does not apply to health care services for inmates in correctional institutions.

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(9).

Page 380

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago