829 P.2d 716
9007-04187; CA A69329Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted March 5, 1992
Affirmed April 22, 1992 Reconsideration denied June 24, 1992 Petition for review denied August 25, 1992 (314 Or. 175)
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.
William C. Snouffer, Judge.
William P. Horton, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the opening brief was Parks, Allen, Livingston
Greif, Portland, and with him on the reply brief was Leo
Horton, Portland.
Ted E. Runstein, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Nolan Shishido and Kell, Alterman
Runstein, Portland.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed.
Page 633
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff assigns error to the granting of defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v., one of the grounds for which was that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The focus of plaintiff’s argument on appeal is that there was supporting evidence. Plaintiff’s designation of record does not include any part of the trial testimony or other evidence, except for selected exhibits. The record before us is not sufficient for us to review the assignment. Universal Ideas Corp. v. Esty, 84 Or. App. 541, 734 P.2d 408 (1987).
Affirmed.
Page 634
501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…
044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…
April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…
March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…
361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…
234 March 9, 2017 No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…