DAVIDSON v. SAIF, 78 Or. App. 187 (1986)

714 P.2d 1117

In the Matter of the Compensation of Raymond P. Davidson, Claimant. DAVIDSON, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION et al, Respondents.

83-10512; CA A34909Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted September 5, 1985.
Affirmed as modified February 26, 1986. Reconsideration allowed May 21, 1986. See 79 Or. App. 448, 719 P.2d 75 (1986).

Judicial Review from Workers’ Compensation Board.

Robert Wollheim, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Welch, Bruun and Green, Portland.

Darrell E. Bewley, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Page 187-a

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Modified to award additional unscheduled permanent partial disability of 56 degrees for aggravation, for a total of 240 degrees; affirmed as modified.

Page 187-b

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

Page 188

PER CURIAM

In this workers’ compensation case involving a claim for aggravation, the issue is the extent of permanent disability. Claimant had previously been awarded permanent partial disability of 184 degrees for 57.5 percent unscheduled disability. He requested a hearing on the determination order which awarded him additional temporary total disability and temporary partial disability but no additional permanent disability. The referee awarded permanent total disability based on the “odd lot” doctrine. The Board reversed, concluding that claimant was not entitled to an increase in permanent disability, because his condition had not worsened since the last determination of permanent disability. ORS 656.273(1). O de novo review, we find that there has been a worsening; before the most recent surgery, it was not clear that claimant’s abdominal weakness could not be permanently corrected but would continually progress to the left of the most recent surgical repair. We determine claimant to have 240 degrees unscheduled permanent partial disability. Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or. App. 103, 105, 585 P.2d 1149, rev den 284 Or. 521 (1978).

Modified to award claimant an additional 56 degrees unscheduled permanent partial disability for aggravation, for a total of 240 degrees; affirmed as modified.

Page 189

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago