NOVY v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 080146B (Or.Tax 8-7-2008)

ELLEN M. NOVY, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 080146B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. August 7, 2008. DECISION JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. Plaintiff seeks a reduction in the real market value (RMV) of real property identified as Account R271388 for tax years 2002-03 through 2006-07. During a case management conference […]

Read More

PFANMULLER v. DEPT. OF REV., 11 OTR 225 (1989)

Edward PFANMULLER v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 2764In the Oregon Tax Court. June 13, 1989. Taxation — Valuation — Methods of valuation 1. An overall capitalization rate reflects the relationship between estimated income and sales price of a property. Taxation — Valuation — Methods of valuation 2. The traditional approaches to valuation, cost, market and […]

Read More

FIRST NAT’L BANK v. DEPT. OF REV., 9 OTR 116 (1981)

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 1457In the Oregon Tax Court. December 7, 1981. Taxation — Inheritance — Accrual of tax — Effect ofcompromise 1. Oregon inheritance tax accrues and the rights of interested persons become fixed on the date of the decedent’s death and these rights are unaffected by compromises […]

Read More

TANATCHANGSANG v. MULTNOMAH CTY. ASS., TC-MD 100364B (Or.Tax 10-5-2010)

SURASAK TANATCHANGSANG and PLERNPIT TANATCHANGSANG, Plaintiffs, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 100364B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. October 5, 2010. Page 1 DECISION JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. This appeal concerns the real market value (RMV) of certain residential property for the 2009-10 tax year. The property is identified in the Multnomah […]

Read More

GLICK v. DEPT. OF REV., 13 OTR 288 (1995)

Edward B. and Florence W. GLICK v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 3649In the Oregon Tax Court. June 6, 1995. Income taxation — Pension distribution 1. ORS 316.159 allows for the subtraction from income of distributions from plans or trusts under IRC § 408 or IRC § 401(c)(3), because plaintiffs’ pension distributions were from IRC § […]

Read More

THARALSON ET AL v. ST. OF ORE. AND DEPT. OF REV., 6 OTR 533 (1976)

ERIC THARALSON, Testamentary Trustee of Trust Established by Will of Agnes E. Tharalson, AND ESTATE OF GWENDOLYN MILLER, Deceased v. STATE OF OREGON AND DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. October 27, 1976. Constitutional law — Due process — Taxation of property 1. The operation of ORS 118.095, a part of the Oregon […]

Read More

FRED MEYER, INC. v. DEPT. OF REV., 12 OTR 85 (1991)

FRED MEYER, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 3049In the Oregon Tax Court. November 20, 1991. Property valuation — True cash value — Market test 1. The test of true cash value is a market test. It does not matter whether a particular owner underuses or overuses the property. Property valuation — Highest and best […]

Read More

LATOURETTE v. COMMISSION, 3 OTR 120 (1967)

EARL C. LATOURETTE, JR., TRUSTEE v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. November 8, 1967. Trust — Revocable — Grantor taxed 1. Income is taxable to the grantors of a trust if the trust is revocable under ORS 316.830. Otherwise it is taxable to the trust under ORS 316.815(5). Trust — Grantor taxed […]

Read More

WOOD v. OREGON STATE BOARD OF FORESTRY, 5 OTR 193 (1973)

HUGH B. and HELEN L. WOOD v. OREGON STATE BOARD OF FORESTRY In the Oregon Tax Court. March 9, 1973. Timber tax — “Forest land” — Defined 1. “Forest land” does not have the same definition under ORS 321.605 (3) as under ORS 321.705 (3). Timber taxes — Declassification — Additional tax 2. Declassification of […]

Read More

ECUMENICAL MINISTRIES v. DEPT. OF REV., 12 OTR 302 (1992)

ECUMENICAL MINISTRIES OF OREGON, a non-profit corporation v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 3103In the Oregon Tax Court. October 7, 1992. Property taxation — Appeal rights — Exempt property 1. When an assessor determines that property is only partially exempt, the taxpayer must timely appeal if it does not agree. Property taxation — Appeal rights — […]

Read More

YOUNG v. JACKSON CTY. ASSESSOR, 17 OTR-MD 78 (2002)

Scott C. YOUNG, M.D. and Robin A. James, Plaintiffs, v. JACKSON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 011076A.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division. Decision for Plaintiffs was rendered August 9, 2002. Plaintiffs appealed the Defendant’s act of disqualifying their property from special assessment as lands in farm use for the 2001-02 tax year. Plaintiffs asked the […]

Read More

WEBB v. DEPT. OF REV., 18 OTR 381 (2006)

Noell WEBB, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. No. TC 4731.In the Oregon Tax Court. Decision for Plaintiff rendered December 6, 2005. Decision on merits rendered April 7, 2006. See Webb v. Dept. of Rev., 19 OTR 20 (2006). Plaintiff (taxpayer) failed to timely file her personal income tax return with Defendant Department of Revenue […]

Read More

J. R. SIMPLOT CO. v. DEPT. OF REV., 12 OTR 391 (1993)

J. R. SIMPLOT COMPANY v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LAMB-WESTON, INC., Intervenor UMATILLA COUNTY v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LAMB-WESTON, INC., Intervenor J. R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, Intervenor TC 2885 TC 2962In the Oregon Tax Court. March 19, 1993. Appraisal theory — Functional obsolescence 1. Functional obsolescence is depreciation or loss in value due to changes in technology […]

Read More

PENN PHILLIPS v. COMMISSION, 2 OTR 373 (1966)

PENN PHILLIPS LANDS, INC. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. May 18, 1966. Jurisdiction — Parties 1. The court does not have jurisdiction to raise the valuation of private lands in the area other than the plaintiff’s if these other private owners are not parties to the suit and have had no […]

Read More

TAYLOR v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, 14 OTR 581 (1999)

Emma E. TAYLOR and Eugene E. Feltz v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR and DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Intervenor TC 4302.In the Oregon Tax Court. June 3, 1999. PROPERTY TAXATION — STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION — CONSTITUTIONALINTERPRETATION — DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM ASSESSED VALUE 1. The court must turn to the constitution in determining a claim under ORS 308.146 because it […]

Read More

JOHNSON v. COMMISSION, 2 OTR 256 (1965)

JOHNSON v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. December 27, 1965. Partnerships — Taxation 1. Partnerships are not taxable entities and persons carrying on business as partners are liable for income tax only in their separate capacity. Partnerships — Taxation — Information returns 2. The partnership files no taxable return but rather an […]

Read More

BERRY v. COMMISSION, 1 OTR 524 (1964)

BERRY v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. March 10, 1964. Deductions — Connected with source 1. The plain meaning of ORS 316.360 requires a direct connection between the creation of Oregon source income and the claimed deduction. Deductions — Connected with source — Nonresidents 2. ORS 316.360(1) does not limit nonresident deductions […]

Read More

FIRST INTERSTATE BANK v. DEPT. OF REV., 10 OTR 452 (1987)

FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF OREGON, N.A. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 2515In the Oregon Tax Court. July 10, 1987 Taxation — Valuation — Market value and sale price 1. The statutes mandate that taxable property be valued at its true cash value, which is defined by statute to mean “market value.” Taxation — Valuation — […]

Read More

BAZZAZ v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 080043B (Or.Tax 4-23-2008)

ALA BAZZAZ, Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 080043B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. April 23, 2008. DECISION OF DISMISSAL JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for want of prosecution. A case management conference was scheduled on April 3, […]

Read More

WILLIAMSON v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 080147B (Or.Tax 7-31-2008)

JENNIFER M. WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 080147B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. July 31, 2008. DECISION OF DISMISSAL JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss (motion), filed March 17, 2008, as part of its Answer, requesting that […]

Read More

YAMHILL CTY. ASS. v. JOHNSON LIVING TR., TC-MD 090721B (Or.Tax 3-14-2011)

YAMHILL COUNTY ASSESSOR, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON LIVING TRUST, RALPH AND NORMA JOHNSON TRUSTEES, Defendants. TC-MD 090721B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. March 14, 2011. DECISION JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals the Yamhill County Board of Property Tax Appeals Order, dated March 18, 2009, reducing the 2008-09 real market value of […]

Read More

CROSSING @ GRESHAM STAT v. MULTNOMAH CTY., TC-MD 091389B (Or.Tax 9-1-2010)

THE CROSSING @ GRESHAM STATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR and DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendants. TC-MD 091389B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. September 1, 2010. Page 1 DECISION OF DISMISSAL JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. Plaintiff filed its Complaint on August 9, 2009. An Order of Abeyance was issued […]

Read More

GANGLE v. DEPT. OF REV., 13 OTR 343 (1995)

Jim GANGLE, Lane County Assessor v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and EVERGREEN UNION RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., Intervenor TC 3384In the Oregon Tax Court. August 9, 1995. Property taxation — Real market value 1. “Depreciation” under ORS 308.490(2)(b) means accounting or book depreciation. Property taxation — Real market value — Approaches tovaluation 2. Unless an estimate of […]

Read More

BENEVOLENT PROTECTIVE ORDER v. DEPT. OF REV., 6 OTR 488 (1976)

BENEVOLENT PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS, LODGE NO. 1680 v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. July 27, 1976. Taxation — Valuation — Current use 1. A specialized building with an ongoing use, which is the highest and best use, should be valued at that use. Taxation — Valuation — Cost to owner 2. […]

Read More

SWED. ENGI. WEST INC v. LANE COUNTY ASS., TC-MD 110949N (Or.Tax 11-30-2011)

SWEDISH ENGINEERING WEST INC, Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 110949N.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. November 30, 2011. DECISION OF DISMISSAL ALLISON R. BOOMER, Magistrate Pro Tempore. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s verbal request to withdraw the appeal, made at the case management conference on November 28, […]

Read More

GELDERMANN AND COMPANY, INC. v. DEPT. OF REV., 10 OTR 249 (1985)

GELDERMANN AND COMPANY, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 2000In the Oregon Tax Court. July 2, 1985. Taxation — Corporate franchises and privileges 1. The statutory definition of doing business found in ORS 317.010 has remained essentially unchanged since its adoption. Taxation — Corporate franchises and privileges 2. Doing business has been judicially interpreted as […]

Read More

KING v. DEPT. OF REV., 12 OTR 491 (1993)

Jeffrey H. KING and Susan E. King v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Intervenor TC 3318In the Oregon Tax Court. July 30, 1993. Property valuation — Burden of proof 1. In a dispute over the value of the property, it is not enough for a taxpayer to criticize an appraiser’s position. The taxpayer has the […]

Read More

CONTRERAS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 110029D (Or.Tax 7-22-2011)

JORGE CONTRERAS and ROSALIA VILLA, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 110029D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. July 22, 2011. DECISION OF DISMISSAL JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. On April […]

Read More

MAZAMAS v. DEPT. OF REV., 12 OTR 414 (1993)

MAZAMAS, a nonprofit Oregon corporation v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 3294In the Oregon Tax Court. April 9, 1993. Property taxation — Charitable organization 1. In order for an organization to be considered charitable, it “must have charity as its primary, if not sole object.”SW Oregon Pub. Def. Services v. Dept. of Rev., 312 Or. 82, […]

Read More

MOLINARI v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 080544B (Or.Tax 8-27-2008)

MICHAEL L. MOLINARI and CAMILLE MOLINARI, Plaintiffs, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 080544B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. August 27, 2008. DECISION OF DISMISSAL JEFFREY S. MATTSON, MAGISTRATE. This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for want of prosecution. A case management conference was […]

Read More

GIANGROSSI v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 100593D (Or.Tax 9-27-2010)

ROY A. GIANGROSSI and ROGENE C. GIANGROSSI, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 100593D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. September 27, 2010. Page 1 DECISION OF DISMISSAL JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for want […]

Read More

WILSON v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 091209C (Or.Tax 2-7-2011)

JERRY WILSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 091209C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. February 7, 2011. DECISION DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. Plaintiff appealed Defendant’s June 2, 2009, Conference Decision Letter which disallowed his alimony deductions for tax years 2005, 2006, and 2007. Plaintiff appeared in this court on […]

Read More

WORRELL v. DEPT. OF REV., 7 OTR 128 (1977)

KIM WORRELL v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Intervenor: THE ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND IN OREGON In the Oregon Tax Court. May 9, 1977. Statutes — Construction and operation — Statutes in pari materia 1. When ascertaining the legislative intent for a particular statute, other statutes in pari materia must be considered. Taxation — Exemptions — Power to […]

Read More

DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS v. DEPT. OF REV., 9 OTR 205 (1982)

DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS, PORTLAND CHAPTER NO. 1, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 1431In the Oregon Tax Court. July 29, 1982. Gaming — Constitutional and statutory provisions —Construction 1. ORS 167.117 legalizes playing of bingo upon premises of fraternal organizations. Statutes — Construction and operation — Construction withreference to other statutes 2. ORS 307.136 does […]

Read More

YAMHILL CTY. ASS. v. JOHNSON LIVING TR., TC-MD 090716B (Or.Tax 3-14-2011)

YAMHILL COUNTY ASSESSOR, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON LIVING TRUST, RALPH AND NORMA JOHNSON TRUSTEES, Defendants. TC-MD 090716B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. March 14, 2011. DECISION JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals the Yamhill County Board of Property Tax Appeals Order, dated March 18, 2009, reducing the 2008-09 real market value of […]

Read More

YAMHILL CTY. ASS. v. JOHNSON LIVING, TC-MD 090706B (Or.Tax 3-14-2011)

YAMHILL COUNTY ASSESSOR, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON LIVING TRUST, RALPH AND NORMA JOHNSON TRUSTEES, Defendants. TC-MD 090706B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. March 14, 2011. DECISION JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals the Yamhill County Board of Property Tax Appeals Order, dated March 18, 2009, reducing the 2008-09 real market value of […]

Read More

LONG v. MARION COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 070681C (Or.Tax 2-6-2008)

RAYMOND L. LONG, Plaintiff, v. MARION COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 070681C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. February 6, 2008. DECISION DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals from Defendant’s determination to disqualify a 2.6 acre parcel of land from farm use special assessment for the 2007-08 tax year. Trial was held by telephone November […]

Read More

SURRETT v. DEPT. OF REV., 12 OTR 81 (1991)

John C. SURRETT v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 3108In the Oregon Tax Court. November 14, 1991. Property valuation — Trending 1. ORS 309.115, the “freeze statute,” does not prevent the assessor from increasing assessed valuation based on trending. Property valuation — Land 2. When estimating the value of comparable land which also contains improvements, it […]

Read More

K S HOLDINGS v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, TC-MD 110043D (Or.Tax 7-26-2011)

K S HOLDINGS, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 110043D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. July 26, 2011. DECISION OF DISMISSAL JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss the above-entitled matter for lack of prosecution. On July 7, 2011, the court […]

Read More

MCQUILLAN v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 101210C (Or.Tax 3-11-2011)

JEREMY MCQUILLAN and PAMELA MCQUILLAN, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 101210C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. March 11, 2011. DECISION OF DISMISSAL DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss on the ground that Plaintiffs failed to appeal within the 90 […]

Read More

TVKO v. HOWLAND, 15 OTR 402 (2002)

Gross Receipts Tax TVKO, a subdivision of Home Box Office, a division of Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF v. TVKO’S MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COST LERON R. HOWLAND, Superintendent of the Oregon Department of State Police; ADOLFO AKIL, Member of the Oregon State […]

Read More

STONE v. DEPT. OF REV., 5 OTR 503 (1974)

EDGAR L. STONE v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. April 19, 1974. Homeowner’s property tax relief — Limitation period 1. Absent a showing of estoppel or other equitable foundation, there exists no power to waive the period of limitations for homeowner’s property tax relief. Trial had April 15, 1974, in the courtroom […]

Read More

YAMHILL COUNTY ASSESSOR v. ABRAMS, TC-MD 090756D (Or.Tax 4-15-2010)

YAMHILL COUNTY ASSESSOR. Plaintiff, v. MARALYNN ABRAMS, Defendant. TC-MD 090756D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. April 15, 2010. DECISION JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals the Yamhill County Board of Property Tax Appeals’ Real Property Order for the subject property identified as Tax Lot R4418B 03400, for tax year 2008-09. A […]

Read More

FIRST EVANGELICAN UNITED BRETHREN CHURCH v. COMM., 1 OTR 249 (1963)

THE FIRST EVANGELICAL UNITED BRETHREN CHURCH, LAWRENCE RICH, EARLE RIGGS, JOHN BEHRENS, FRED SCHARF, NICK LERUD, T. JACK KUNDERT AND WARREN PAHL, AS TRUSTEES v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. April 4, 1963. Pleadings — Nonjoinder — Intervention 1. When defendant demurred and filed a plea in abatement contending the trustees were […]

Read More

COOK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. DEPT. OF REV., 8 OTR 205 (1979)

COOK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. October 24, 1979. Statutes — Construction and Operation — Contemporaneous construction in general 1. In construing a statute, its meaning as applied to a specific set of circumstances must be derived from a number of cases. Statutes — Construction and Operation — Contemporaneous […]

Read More

J. R. WIDMER, INC. v. DEPT. OF REV., 10 OTR 29 (1985)

J. R. WIDMER, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 2163In the Oregon Tax Court. January 24, 1985. Municipal corporation — Power to tax for general municipal purposes 1. ” ‘To do business’ means to engage in any activity in pursuit of gain.” MCC 5.70.010(B). Municipal corporation — Power to tax for general municipal purposes 2. […]

Read More

LEAF v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 15 OTR 53 (1999)

ANDREW C. LEAF, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC 4332.In the Oregon Tax Court. October 4, 1999. Defendant moved for summary judgment seeking a determination that distributions from an IRA are subject to personal income tax. Plaintiff argued that distributions from his IRA are exempt because all contributions to the IRA […]

Read More

McCLUNG v. DEPT. OF REV., 8 OTR 175 (1979)

HOWARD McCLUNG v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, GERALD WHITLATCH and NICK OSTAPKEVICH In the Oregon Tax Court. July 16, 1979. Taxation — Levy and assessment — Real property — Timber and timberlands 1. The Eastern Oregon severance tax is imposed upon all owners of timber in Eastern Oregon at a rate of five […]

Read More

ALDRICH v. DEPT. OF REV., 4 OTR 73 (1970)

WILLARD MAXWELL ALDRICH AND MILDRED G. ALDRICH v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. February 17, 1970. Statutory construction — Federal revenue ruling 1. Administrative interpretation of federal statutes and regulations is informative only and not binding on the Court. Statutory construction — Exclusions from gross income — Minister’s housing allowance 2. Statute […]

Read More

ROY L. HOUCK SONS v. COMMISSION, 1 OTR 286 (1963)

ROY L. HOUCK SONS v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. March 19, 1963. Exemptions — Fixed load vehicles 1. Component parts of asphalt and crushing plants to which frames with axles and wheels were bolted or welded were validly licensed as fixed load vehicles and exempt from ad valorem taxation under ORS […]

Read More

ROY MOBILE HOMES, INC. v. DEPT. OF REV., 7 OTR 95 (1977)

ROY MOBILE HOMES, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. March 16, 1977. Taxation — Income taxes — Constitutional provisions 1. Oregon Constitution, Article IV, Section 32, does not affect the interpretation of ORS chapter 317, which relates to corporate excise taxes. Taxation — Income taxes — Classification 2. The legislature’s power […]

Read More

CALHOUN v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, TC-MD 101356B (Or.Tax 4-22-2011)

TIM CALHOUN and JENNIFER CALHOUN, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 101356B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. April 22, 2011. DECISION OF DISMISSAL ALLISON R. BOOMER, Magistrate Pro Tempore. This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. A […]

Read More

WILLAM. FALLS HOSP. v. CLACK. CTY. ASS., TC-MD 090791 (Or.Tax 3-30-2011)

WILLAMETTE FALLS HOSPITAL, Plaintiff, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 090791 B (Control); 090792B; 090793B; 090794B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. March 30, 2011. DECISION JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals from the Clackamas County Assessor’s denials of exemptions from ad valorem property tax for four categories of personal property owned […]

Read More

FERO v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 110806C (Or.Tax 12-8-2011)

REBECCA A. FERO and AAMIR AZIZ, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 110806C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. December 8, 2011. DECISION OF DISMISSAL DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court on its Order dated November 3, 2011. Plaintiffs filed their appeal on May 27, 2011, […]

Read More

PURTZER v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, TC-MD 081160D (Or.Tax 1-8-2010)

REGINA PURTZER, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 081160D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. January 8, 2010. DECISION JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals Defendant’s Notices of Deficiency Assessment, dated August 21, 2007, for tax years 1999 and 2001. A trial was held in the Tax Court […]

Read More

THORNTON v. DEPT. OF REV., 4 OTR 243 (1970)

H. E. THORNTON v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. December 7, 1970. True cash value — Market data approach — Contract sale 1. In a determination of the true cash value of land it is improper to assign an arbitrary percentage factor to a sale because it is made on a conditional […]

Read More

GUARNEROS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 100017D (Or.Tax 6-21-2010)

ANTONIO GUARNEROS, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 100017D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. June 21, 2010. Page 1 DECISION OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff appealed Defendant’s Notices of Deficiency Assessment, dated December 18, 2009, denying Plaintiff’s claimed filing status and exemptions for dependents for tax years 2006 and 2007. […]

Read More

OLYMPIA BREWING CO. v. DEPT. OF REV., 5 OTR 99 (1972)

OLYMPIA BREWING COMPANY v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. September 25, 1972. Public Law 86-272 — Beyond permissible solicitation 1. If taxpayer’s activities in Oregon exceed the permissible solicitation of orders allowed by PL 86-272, taxpayer is subject to Oregon’s corporation income tax. Public Law 86-272 — Permissible solicitation 2. If taxpayer’s […]

Read More

CLARK, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 15 OTR 209 (2000)

Gary Alan CLARK, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. TC 4426In the Oregon Tax Court. September 8, 2000 Plaintiff motioned for reconsideration of a court order in which taxpayer’s wages were found to be subject to Oregon income taxation. The court granted that motion, cited authority showing Plaintiff’s wages as taxable, and ordered Plaintiff to […]

Read More

WESTERN STATES FIRE v. DEPT. OF REV., 4 OTR 11 (1969)

WESTERN STATES FIRE APPARATUS, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. December 12, 1969. Taxable situs — Personal property — Owner’s domicile 1. Generally the taxable situs of personal property is the owner’s domicile. Taxable situs — Personal property — Temporary absence from owner’s domicile 2. Personal property temporarily outside of owner’s […]

Read More

WEBB v. DEPT. OF REV., 19 OTR 20 (2006)

Noell WEBB, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. TC 4731.In the Oregon Tax Court. Decision for Defendant rendered April 27, 2006. Plaintiff (taxpayer) contends that the Department of Revenue (the department) was estopped from denying payment of taxpayer’s refund due to the department’s misleading oral communications. Without detailed memoranda written contemporaneously with the communications and […]

Read More

18TH DEKUM ST. MARKET v. DEPT. OF REV., TC-MD 060771C (Or.Tax 7-25-2008)

18TH DEKUM ST. MARKET, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 060771C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Cigarette and Tobacco Tax. July 25, 2008. DECISION DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. Plaintiff appealed Defendant’s denial of an application for distributor licenses for cigarettes and other tobacco products (e.g., cigars), and for a cigarette wholesaler’s […]

Read More

THE MKS FOUND. v. YAMHILL CTY. ASSESS., TC-MD 110037D (Or.Tax 6-21-2011)

THE MICHAEL KING SMITH FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, v. YAMHILL COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 110037D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. June 21, 2011. DECISION OF DISMISSAL JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. This matter is before the court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss, included in its Answer, filed February 18, 2011, stating that Plaintiff’s Complaint […]

Read More

KINGSLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 15 OTR 293 (2001)

GEORGE W. KINGSLEY, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC 4424In the Oregon Tax Court. JANUARY 5, 2001. Plaintiff appealed the assessment of additional income taxes deriving from disallowance of bad-debt losses, a dependent’s exemption, and certain income calculations. The court held that three of Plaintiff’s promissory notes became worthless in 1989 […]

Read More

DENNIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 091424D (Or.Tax 9-8-2010)

DELOY L. DENNIS and CAROL A. SUTTON, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 091424D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. September 8, 2010. Page 1 DECISION JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. Plaintiffs appeal Defendant’s Notice of Refund Denial, dated September 10, 2009, for Oregon income tax year 2005. A […]

Read More

EMERALD PEOPLE’S UTILITY DIST. v. DEPT. OF REV., 10 OTR 207 (1986)

EMERALD PEOPLE’S UTILITY DISTRICT v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 2197 and 2357In the Oregon Tax Court. January 23, 1986. Taxation — Liability of persons and property — Property ofstate or municipality 1. The apparent intent of ORS 261.050 is to render PUDs property taxable just as privately owned property is taxable. Taxation — Levy and […]

Read More

ALLEN v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 070852C (Or.Tax 2-28-2008)

TERRI L. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 070852C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. February 28, 2008. DECISION DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals a school bond levy for the 2007-08 tax year in the amount of $937.62. The February 12, 2008, case management conference was converted to a trial at […]

Read More

SHEFFIELD v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 090001C (Or.Tax 3-11-2009)

PHILIP L. SHEFFIELD and PATRICIA L. SHEFFIELD, Plaintiffs, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 090001C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. March 11, 2009. DECISION DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ appeal for lack of aggrievement. The court discussed the matter with the […]

Read More

BANDUCCI v. DOUGLAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 091259C (Or.Tax 7-30-2010)

RICHARD BANDUCCI, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 091259C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. July 30, 2010. Page 1 DECISION DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court upon the integrated agreement of the parties, pursuant to which the real market value (RMV) and “exception” RMV for the improvements on […]

Read More

AGATE v. DEPT. OF REV., 5 OTR 25 (1972)

MURRAY D. AGATE and EDITH M. AGATE v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. March 2, 1972. Trial had December 15, 1971, in Oregon Tax Court Courtroom, Salem. J. Ray Rhoten, Rhoten, Rhoten Speerstra, Salem, represented plaintiffs. G. F. Bartz, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, represented defendant. Decision for plaintiff rendered March 2, 1972. […]

Read More

BREWSTER v. COMMISSION, 3 OTR 406 (1969)

EFFIE L. BREWSTER v. COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. March 25, 1969. Trial had March 18, 1969, in Linn County, Albany, Oregon. Laurence Morley, Morley, Thomas, Orona Kingsley, Lebanon, Oregon, represented plaintiff. Alfred B. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, represented the defendant. Decision for plaintiff rendered March 25, 1969. EDWARD H. HOWELL, Judge. The plaintiff […]

Read More

ESTER v. CITY OF MONMOUTH, 13 OTR 104 (1994)

Lorraine M. ESTER v. CITY OF MONMOUTH TC 3528In the Oregon Tax Court. June 9, 1994. Constitutional interpretation 1. Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution, does not guarantee the owner of property a remedy for violations of Article XI, section 11b, of the Oregon Constitution. Constitutional interpretation 2. The “ten interested taxpayers” requirement […]

Read More

HAZELTON v. COMMISSION, 2 OTR 50 (1964)

HAZELTON v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. October 15, 1964. Statutes — IRS interpretation of similar statutes — Legislative intent 1. Legislative intent is presumed in most income tax cases to follow the federal rulings when the statutes are similar. Deductions — Traveling expenses — Armed forces reserve duty 2. A National […]

Read More

LEWIS v. DEPT. OF REV., 10 OTR 128 (1985)

LEWIS et al v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 2205In the Oregon Tax Court. September 9, 1985. Taxation — Levy and assessment — Particular real property 1. ORS 94.285(1) requires separate assessment and taxation for properties subject to Oregon’s unit ownership laws. Taxation — Levy and assessment — Particular real property 2. By subjecting their property […]

Read More

CLIFF v. DEPT. OF REV., 8 OTR 250 (1980)

CAMERON CLIFF v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. January 7, 1980. Levy and assessment — Mode of assessment in general — Real property 1. Income approach is the only reasonable method of ascertaining value when land is zoned for farm use purposes. Levy and assessment — Mode of assessment in general — […]

Read More

KAZEROUNI v. BENTON COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 090644C (Or.Tax 12-10-2009)

M. RAHIM KAZEROUNI and LEWA KAZEROUNI, Plaintiffs, v. BENTON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 090644C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. December 10, 2009. DECISION OF DISMISSAL DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. Plaintiffs appeal to the court from an order of the county board of property tax appeals (board), seeking a reduction in the assessed value […]

Read More

JAYNE v. COMMISSION, 2 OTR 65 (1965)

JAYNE v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. January 22, 1965. Capital gains and losses — Reinvestment — Personal residence 1. A personal residence is a qualified investment for special capital gains treatment. Capital gains and losses — Qualifying corporations — Municipal corporations 2. The commission determines if a corporation qualifies by computing […]

Read More

FROEHLICH v. WASCO COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 100219C (Or.Tax 5-26-2010)

SUSAN FROEHLICH, Plaintiff, v. WASCO COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 100219C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. May 26, 2010. Page 1 DECISION DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court on Defendant’s written request for dismissal, contained in its Answer filed March 26, 2010. Hearing on the matter was held April 20, […]

Read More

TALLMAN v. DEPT. OF REV., 5 OTR 375 (1973)

JIM D. AND NANCY J. TALLMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. December 20, 1973. Deduction — Net operating loss 1. Net operating loss carry-forward is only available to the extent it affects the federal taxable income for the relevant years and no carry-back is available on a state return filed before […]

Read More

CHMELA v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 100292C (Or.Tax 2-10-2011)

FRANK CHMELA, Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 100292C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. February 10, 2011. DECISION DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court for Decision on Plaintiff’s request for cancellation of taxes for the 2009-10 tax year due to the destruction of Plaintiff’s rental home by fire. […]

Read More

DOLGOS v. WASHINGTON CTY. ASSESSOR, TC-MD 090299B (Or.Tax 11-24-2009)

STEFAN DOLGOS and MARGITA DOLGOS, Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 090299B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. November 24, 2009. DECISION JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. This appeal concerns the real market value (RMV) of certain residential property for the 2008-09 tax year. The property is identified in the Washington County tax […]

Read More

YAMHILL CTY. ASS. v. JOHNSON LIVING TR., TC-MD 090718B (Or.Tax 3-14-2011)

YAMHILL COUNTY ASSESSOR, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON LIVING TRUST, RALPH AND NORMA JOHNSON TRUSTEES, Defendants. TC-MD 090718B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. March 14, 2011. DECISION JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals the Yamhill County Board of Property Tax Appeals Order, dated March 18, 2009, reducing the 2008-09 real market value of […]

Read More

McINNIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 090312B (Or.Tax 6-12-2009)

WILLIAM A. McINNIS, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 090312B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. June 12, 2009. Page 1 DECISION JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. A case management conference was held May 14, 2009. Patricia M. Brioady participated for her father, the Plaintiff. Faith Derickson represented Defendant. The […]

Read More

GEET GOVIND v. MULTNOMAH CTY. ASSESSOR, TC-MD 110627D (Or.Tax 10-18-2011)

GEET GOVIND LLC, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 110627D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. October 18, 2011. DECISION OF DISMISSAL JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed October 4, 2011, requesting that the Complaint be dismissed. In its Motion to […]

Read More

COLUMBIA MTR. HOTELS v. COMMISSION, 3 OTR 48 (1967)

COLUMBIA MOTOR HOTELS, INC. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. June 5, 1967. Statute unconstitutional — Fourteenth Amendment — Corporate liquidation 1. ORS 317.247(5) is clearly a violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment for it discriminates against corporations with nonresident stockholders. Corporations — Equal protection rights 2. The […]

Read More

WEST FOODS v. DEPT. OF REV., 10 OTR 7 (1985)

WEST FOODS, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 1748In the Oregon Tax Court. January 15, 1985. Taxation — Exemptions — Statutory provisions 1. Inventory, defined as tangible personal property, including equipment, used in agricultural or horticultural use is exempt from ad valorem taxation. ORS 310.608. (Now ORS 307.400). Taxation — Levy and assessment — Rural […]

Read More

YBARRA v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 110803C (Or.Tax 12-8-2011)

JOHN P. YBARRA and YOLANDA L. YBARRA, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 110803C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. December 8, 2011. DECISION OF DISMISSAL DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. Plaintiffs filed […]

Read More

MITSUBISHI INTL. CORP. v. DEPT. OF REV., 8 OTR 97 (1979)

MITSUBISHI INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In the Oregon Tax Court. March 6, 1979. Commerce — Subjects of regulation — Exports 1. The Import-Export Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibits any state, absent the consent of Congress, from levying taxes on imports or exports, except when absolutely necessary for executing that state’s inspection laws. […]

Read More

LECHNYR v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 080653B (Or.Tax 6-19-2009)

RONALD J. LECHNYR, Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 080653B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. June 19, 2009. DECISION JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. This appeal concerns entitlement to a veteran’s property tax exemption for the 2008-09 tax year. The residential property is identified as Account 0728087 in the Lane County tax […]

Read More

BUSH v. COMMISSION, 2 OTR 239 (1965)

BUSH v. STATE TAX COMMISSION In the Oregon Tax Court. November 10, 1965. Bad debts — Requirement — Bona fide loan 1. Whether a bona fide loan existed is a question of fact. Bad debts — Bona fide loan — Burden of proof 2. Plaintiff fails to sustain the burden of proof when he fails […]

Read More

MAGINNIS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 14 OTR 512 (1999)

J. Michael MAGINNIS and Janet Y. Maginnis v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. TC 4310.In the Oregon Tax Court. Decided January 25, 1999. INCOME TAXATION 1. To the extent practicable, Oregon follows federal income tax laws and principles. INCOME TAXATION — CHARACTER OF INCOME — ASSIGNMENTS 2. Under federal income tax laws, the character of income does […]

Read More

BITTNER v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 15 OTR 18 (1999)

George H. BITTNER and Dorcas Jeanne Bittner, husband and wife v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TC 4157In the Oregon Tax Court. July 20, 1999 Plaintiffs claimed the right to defer recognition of gain from the sale of their property, which consisted of a residence on 80.31 acres of land. They appealed additional income tax assessments when […]

Read More

DUFAULT v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 080647B (Or.Tax 11-13-2008)

RICHARD J. DUFAULT, Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 080647B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. November 13, 2008. DECISION JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals concerning certain additional taxes imposed by Defendant covering tax years 2003-04 through 2006-07. A case management conference was held on September 4, 2008. Richard J. Dufault […]

Read More

MAI v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 090074B (Or.Tax 5-28-2009)

PHONG MAI, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 090074B.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. May 28, 2009. DECISION JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals concerning certain tobacco tax matters for the 2007 tax year. A case management conference was held April 29, 2009. Phong Mai participated on his […]

Read More

SCHMIDT v. DEPT. OF REVENUE, 19 OTR 502 (2008)

Jack R. SCHMIDT, Jr. and Lynette M. Dupeé, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. TC 4817.In the Oregon Tax Court. Decision for Defendant rendered September 23, 2008. Plaintiffs (taxpayers) appeal the denial of their 2006 income tax “kicker” refund by Defendant (the department). Under a general policy, the department would not make refund payments to […]

Read More

McCOWN TRUST v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, TC-MD 090270 (Or.Tax 5-10-2010)

McCOWN LIVING TRUST, Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 090270.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. May 10, 2010. Page 1 DECISION DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. Plaintiff has appealed the real market value (RMV) of certain real property consisting of a home and land in rural Lane County and identified as Account 1771318. […]

Read More

SARAGOZA v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TC-MD 101140C (Or.Tax 12-8-2010)

CONSUELO C. SARAGOZA, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 101140C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Income Tax. December 8, 2010. DECISION OF DISMISSAL DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s appeal for tax year 2009 on the ground that Plaintiff failed to […]

Read More

CATERING AT ITS BEST v. MULT. CTY. ASS., TC-MD 090837C (Or.Tax 10-1-2009)

CATERING AT ITS BEST, INC., Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 090837C.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. October 1, 2009. Page 1 DECISION OF DISMISSAL DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on Defendant Multnomah County Assessor’s (Assessor) Motion to Dismiss (Motion) on the ground that Plaintiff […]

Read More

YAMHILL COUNTY ASSESSOR v. ABRAMS, TC-MD 090757D (Or.Tax 4-15-2010)

YAMHILL COUNTY ASSESSOR. Plaintiff, v. MARALYNN ABRAMS, Defendant. TC-MD 090757D.In the Oregon Tax Court. Magistrate Division, Property Tax. April 15, 2010. DECISION JILL A. TANNER, Presiding Magistrate. Plaintiff appeals the Yamhill County Board of Property Tax Appeals’ Real Property Order for the subject property identified as Tax Lot R4418B 03300, for tax year 2008-09. A […]

Read More

SHERMAN v. DEPT. OF REV., 17 OTR 132 (2003)

Philip SHERMAN and Vivian Sherman, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. TC 4612.In the Oregon Tax Court. Regular Division. Decision for Defendant rendered July 24, 2003. Plaintiffs own a houseboat that is assessed as personal property; they seek reduction in the real market value and maximum assessed value for the property by reason of destruction […]

Read More