Categories: Oregon Supreme Court

BROWER v. LEAVITT, 128 Or. 176 (1929)

273 P. 721

C.C. BROWER v. A.L. LEAVITT.

Oregon Supreme Court.Argued January 16, 1929
Affirmed January 22, 1929

From Klamath: J.U. CAMPBELL, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

For appellant there was a brief over the name of Mr. W.H.A. Renner, with an oral argument by Mr. C.C. Brower.

For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Wm. Ganong.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the complaint after a demurrer to his second amended complaint had been sustained. Defendant did not appear in the oral argument presented to this court. We have carefully considered the second amended complaint and the argument advanced by plaintiff in his own behalf orally and find that the complaint does not state a cause of action. We concur with the opinion of the learned

Page 177

Circuit Court in this, that the alleged libelous article does not cast any reflection on plaintiff.

For that reason the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 273 P. 721

Recent Posts

STATE v. MCCARTHY, 501 P.3d 478 (2021)

501 P.3d 478 (2021)369 Or. 129 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Steven…

8 months ago

STATE EX REL. S.M. v. A.S., 196 P.3d 26 (2008)

044230S0; A134887. 196 P.3d 26 (2008) 223 Or. App. 421 STATE of Oregon ex rel.…

7 years ago

STATE v. McNALLY, 361 Or. 314 (2017)

April 20, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent…

9 years ago

STATE v. HAUGEN, 361 Or. 284 (2017)

March 30, 2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF BROWN, 361 Or. 241 (2017)

361 Or. 241 In the Matter of the Compensation of Royce L. Brown, Sr., Claimant.…

9 years ago

IN RE ROLLER, 361 Or 234 (2017)

234                                  March 9, 2017                              No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE…

9 years ago